Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Comparison of single-stage and two-phase anaerobic sludge digestion systems : performance and microbial community dynamics
Authors: Maspolim, Yogananda
Zhou, Yan
Guo, Chenghong
Xiao, Keke
Ng, Wun Jern
Keywords: DRNTU::Engineering::Environmental engineering::Water treatment
Issue Date: 2014
Source: Maspolim, Y., Zhou, Y., Guo, C., Xiao, K., & Ng, W. J. (2014). Comparison of single-stage and two-phase anaerobic sludge digestion systems: Performance and microbial community dynamics. Chemosphere, 140, 54-62.
Series/Report no.: Chemosphere
Abstract: This study compared reactor performance and the respective microbial community dynamics in the conventional single-stage and 2-phase anaerobic digestion (AD) systems, treating municipal sludge to generate methane. The 2-phase system’s COD and VS reduction, and methane production could be maintained throughout the three HRTs tested (p = 0.05), which was associated with an increase in organic loading (30 d = 1.5 g COD L−1 d−1, 20 d = 2.2 g COD L−1 d−1 and 10 d = 3.5 g COD L−1 d−1); but this was not so in the single-stage system where it deteriorated at HRT of 10 d (p = 0.05) due to impairment of particulate COD reduction. qPCR, DGGE and the subsequent phylogenetic analysis revealed that microbial adaptation occurred as the seed sludge formed a different community in each reactor at 30 d HRT; however, no further significant microbial shift occurred at lower HRTs. The presence of specific hydrolytic and acidogenic Flavobacteriales and Clostriales in the acidogenic reactor may have allowed for enhanced hydrolysis and acidogenesis, leading to higher organic loading tolerance at 10 d HRT. Methanogenic activity in the acidogenic reactor may have been performed by Methanobacteriales and Methanosarcinaceae. Operation of the acidogenic reactor at neutral pH may have to be considered to ensure the cultivation of propionate oxidising bacteria, which could in turn, prevent reactor “souring” during high load conditions.
ISSN: 0045-6535
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.028
Rights: © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Chemosphere, Elsevier Ltd. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [DOI:].
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:CEE Journal Articles
NEWRI Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CHEM31621R1-a.pdfMain article845.31 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Updated on Sep 6, 2020


Updated on Nov 19, 2020

Page view(s) 50

Updated on Nov 27, 2020


Updated on Nov 27, 2020

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.